76 women met the inclusion criteria for the final analysis (23 with no SUI, 31 with mild SUI, and 22 with severe SUI). There were no statistically significant differences in age, parity or BMI among groups. 12 modes of variation explained significant shape variance and maneuver significantly influenced the overall urethra shape (p<0.001). The difference between rest and Valsalva was significant for modes 1 and 2 specifically (p<0.001). Qualitatively, mode 1 described variation in “c” shape concavity and mode 2 variation in “s” shape concavity that exists in all SUI severity groups. During Valsalva, the urethra became more “s” shaped with distal urethral wall thickening (Figure 1).
Changes in bladder neck retropubic angle, infrapubic urethral length, and the distal urethra’s swing angle relative to the pubic bone from rest to Valsalva were significantly different between groups (p=0.0157, 0.0154, and 0.0098, respectively) (Figure 2). SUI severity influenced the overall urethral shape significantly (p<0.001) and was significant for modes 5 (p=0.001), 7 (p=0.001), and 11 (p=0.009) specifically. For these modes, the continent and severe SUI groups differed significantly (p=0.001, 0.002, and 0.007, respectively) and the continent and mild SUI groups differed for mode 7 (p=0.007). Modes 5, 7, and 11 describe variation in the proportional wall thickness of specific regions of the urethra, indicative of more or less “pinching” or “squeezing” across SUI severity, regardless of maneuver. Together, these modes describe increased “s” shape concavity, distal urethral wall thickening, and proximal urethral pinching in mild and severe SUI urethras compared those in the no SUI group.
The multiple logistic regression comparing mild and severe SUI patients to those with no SUI demonstrated that increased “s” shape concavity and distal urethral wall thickening (described by modes 2, 5, 7, and 11) and urethral swing angle were significant predictors of severe SUI as indicated by their respective odds ratios (OR=1.728, 0.228, 0.309, 9.357, and 1.005) and p-values (p=0.0321, 0.0015, 0.0030, 0.0014, and 0.0012).