Severity and impact of fecal incontinence two decades after no, one and two obstetrical anal sphincter injuries

Nilsson I1, Åkervall S1, Molin M2, Milsom I1, Gyhagen M1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Anorectal / Bowel Dysfunction

Best in Category Prize: Anorectal / Bowel Dysfunction
Abstract 402
Bowel Dysfunction
Scientific Podium Short Oral Session 24
Friday 9th September 2022
16:22 - 16:30
Hall D
Anal Incontinence Female Pelvic Floor Prospective Study Questionnaire
1. Gothenburg Continence Research Center (GCRC), Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2. Statistical Consultancy Group, Gothenburg
In-Person
Presenter
Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
Estimating the prevalence of specific pelvic floor disorders, their associated severity and consequences for daily life is important information for health care planning. A recent study reported on the prevalence of fecal incontinence (FI) in women with no (12%), one (24%), or two (36%) obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) [1]. In the present study we assessed the severity and subjective impact of FI and hypothesized that the severity and subjective impact of FI increased in women with no, one or two OASIs.
Study design, materials and methods
This is a register-based study initiated in 2015 in women with two deliveries. The Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare was requested to identify the potential study population from the Swedish Medical Birth Register (MBR), resulting in 64,687 non-pregnant 2-para women with singleton vaginal births between 1992 to 1998 and no further births. A sample of 11,000 women was randomly selected by Statistics Sweden and invited to participate in the study by returning a postal or a web questionnaire. The questionnaire was returned by 7145 women; 6760 women had no OASI, 357 had one OASI (253 at the first delivery only, and 104 at the second delivery), and 28 had OASI at both deliveries. To achieve equal-sized groups of women with one and two OASIs, the latter group was oversampled by extending the inclusion period to 1987-2000, resulting in 324 women with two OASIs. Given this size of study cohorts, an alfa level of 0.05, a power value of 80%, and using Fisher’s exact test for the analysis, the minimum significant difference in the prevalence of FI was 5% when comparing the control group with either of the two OASI cohorts and 11% when comparing the two OASI cohorts. Third- and fourth-degree OASIs were analyzed as one group. Diagnoses were retrieved from the MBR. OASI was identified by codes 664.2 and 664.3 in the International Classification of Diseases Ninth Revision (ICD-9) (1987-1996), and O70.2 and O70.3 in the Tenth Revision (ICD-10) and by the surgical code MBC33 (1997-2000).
The postal and web-based questionnaire included questions about current symptoms of solid and liquid stool and gas, urinary incontinence, and pelvic organ prolapse. The women were asked to report their current height and weight, menstrual status, hysterectomy, menopause, and hormone treatment. Information from the questionnaire was linked to obstetric details in the MBR. 
Continuous variables were presented as mean and standard deviations and categorical data as number and percentage. Pairwise comparisons were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test and the Mann-Whitney U-test for categorical and continuous variables. The results were presented as the mean difference for continuous variables and as the difference in percentages for categorical variables, 95% CI, and P value. The trend was analyzed using Mantel-Haenszel Chi-square statistics and Spearman´s rank correlation test. Logistic regression was used for analyzing the risk of bothersome FI or bothersome isolated gas incontinence (IGI). Results were presented as BMI and age-adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Statistical significance was set at P < .05.
Results
Bothersome FI increased 3- and 5-fold, from 3.3% in women without OASI, to 10.4% (aOR, 3.25; 95% CI, 2.23-4.73) in women with one OASI and 16.5 % (aOR, 5.16; 95% CI, 3.69-7.22) in women with two OASIs (Figure 1). The prevalence of IGI was about 40% in each group, but bothersome IGI was higher after one and two OASIs (Trend P = 0.0024). 28.2% of women without OASI perceived their FI as bothersome, compared to 43.9% and 46.0% in women with one or two OASIs (Trend P < .0001). The frequency of leakage of solid and liquid stool and IGI increased in women with one or two OASIs compared with those without (Trend all P<.0001). For example, the frequency of any leakage of liquid stool was 10.8% in women with no OASI, 21.7% in women with one, and 34.9% in women with two OASIs (Trend P < .0001). The use of pads was higher in the one and two OASIs groups compared with no OASI, from 2.3% in women without OASI to 7.1% and 8.4% in those with one and two OASIs (Trend P < .0001) (Figure 1). The effect on daily life was reported by 8.6% of women without OASI and 19.7% and 29.6% in women with one and two OASI (Trend P < .0001) (Figure 1). The mean Jorge-Wexner score increased from 2.44 to 3.26, and 3.88 in women with no, one, and two OASIs (Trend P < .0001). In women with a Jorge-Wexner score of six, more than 50% had bothersome anal incontinence (AI), and in those with a score of 9, almost 80% had bothersome AI (Figure 2). Few women had received treatment for bowel leakage, there were however significantly more women with one and two OASIs (3.4% and 4.1%) compared with women without OASI (1.3%) (Trend P < .0001) (Figure 1).
Interpretation of results
All components of the severity of anal incontinence – frequency of leakage, its mental impact (bother), coping strategies (use of pads), and the effect on daily life – all increased consistently in women with no, one or two OASIs.
Concluding message
The cumulative long-term risk of anal incontinence associated with sphincter injuries should be acknowledged by obstetricians and midwives and should be communicated to women as part of the antenatal consultation.
Figure 1 Measures of subjective impact of anal incontinence.
Figure 2 The correlation between bothersome anal incontinence and the Jorge-Wexner incontinence score.
References
  1. Nilsson IEK, Åkervall S, Molin M, Milsom I, Gyhagen M. Symptoms of fecal incontinence two decades after no, one, or two obstetrical anal sphincter injuries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;224:276.e1-276.e23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.051.
Disclosures
Funding M.G. has received honoraria from Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget (SCA), Essity, and Astellas Pharma. I.M. has received honoraria from SCA and Essity, Astellas Pharma, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre Laboratories and Allergan. Grants from the Swedish state financed the study under the ALF-agreement (No. ALFGBG-966115), Hjalmar Svenssons Fund (No. HJSV2021017), and Sparbankstiftelsen Sjuhärad Fund (No. 20201325), they had no role in the design, analysis, interpretation, or writing of the report. Clinical Trial Yes Public Registry No RCT No Subjects Human Ethics Committee Ethical approval was obtained from the Regional Ethical Review Board (reference no 776-13; Nov.18, 2013, Gothenburg). Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes
Citation

Continence 2S2 (2022) 100376
DOI: 10.1016/j.cont.2022.100376

13/12/2024 08:55:58