The Efficacy of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy in Cervical Cuff Prolapsus: Clinical Experiences

Huri E1, Aydin S2, Aydogan T3, Canda E4

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Abstract 860
Non Discussion Video
Scientific Non Discussion Video Session 200
Female Pelvic Organ Prolapse Prolapse Symptoms Surgery Robotic-assisted genitourinary reconstruction
1. Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine Department of Urology, Ankara Turkey, 2. Koc University Faculty of Medicine Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Urogynecology, Istanbul Turkey, 3. Kartal Dr.Lutfi Kirdar Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul Turkey, 4. Koc University Faculty of Medicine Department of Urology, Istanbul Turkey
Links

Abstract

Introduction
Pelvic organ prolapsus (POP) is a common issue and health problem among elderly women. POP involves the displacement of pelvic organs as bladder, uterus, cervical cuff, rectum or even sometimes small intestines descending in to vagina. Nearly 20% of women with POP undergo surgical intervention during their lives (1). POP can significantly impact women’s lives with symptoms of a protruding vaginal mass, pelvic pressure, dyspareunia, and low back pain(2). Abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ACS) is a safe and effective surgical intervention which has higher cure and lower recurrence rates as compared with vaginal approach. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy replaced ACS by years. However, despite a steep learning curve robotic sacrocolpopexy (RSC) offers many advantages as deep pelvic dissection, 3D vision and multiple intracorporeal suturing(3).
Design
A case series of 10 patients with period of menopause whom undergone RSC performed by a high experienced surgeon is evaluated and video case presentation showed properly the important steps of the robotic sacrocolpopexy. 6 of 10 patients also undergone hysterectomy during the procedures. Patent age, gravid, parity, operation type, operation time (minutes), preoperative/postoperative hemoglobin, morbidity, incontinence, complications and duration of hospitalization were all evaluated. 15 X 4 cm Polypropylene mesh used for fixation of cervical cuff to sacral promontory. Tacker used to fix the mesh to the sacral promontorium. 1/0 Running suture used for closure peritoneum onto the mesh reaching from sacral site to proximal vaginal site. One standard stepwise procedure was selected as video presentation to show important anatomic landmarks and technical properties.
Results
The average age of patients was 63.3 (54-73) while gravidity and parity were 3.3 (1-6) and 2.5 (1-3) respectively. Six patients demonstrated stage 4 and rest of them were stage 3 POP status. As concerned for morbidity 4 patients had hypertension out of 2 of them also had diabetes. The average operation time was 122,5 (100-180) minutes. Preoperative mean hemoglobin and hematocrite values were 12.94 (11.8-14.7) and 39.27 (35.4- 41.0) while postoperative were 11.92 (9.9- 14.3) and 35.2 (34.7-42.0) mg /dl respectively. None of the patients needed a blood transfusion. Two patients had early and late surgical complication including pain and denovo urge incontinence consecutively. The mean hospitalization time was 2 (1-3) days and 2 patients described incontinence during the postoperative 1 year follow up period. None of the patients described any recurrences.
Conclusion
RSC is an effective and safe surgical intervention of treatment of postmenopausal women admitting with servical cuff prolapsus.
References
  1. Smith F, Holman C, Moorin R, Tsokos N. Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery forpelvic organ prolapse.Obstet Gynecol2010;116:1096 – 1100
  2. Lukman Y. Utero-vaginal prolapse: a rural disability of the young. East Afr Med J 1995;72:2-9.
  3. Al-Otaibi Mozon, Ju Hee Kim, Sa Ra Lee. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2024;67(2):212-217 https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.23226.
Disclosures
Funding None Clinical Trial Yes Public Registry No RCT No Subjects Human Ethics not Req'd clinical case series Helsinki Yes Informed Consent Yes
21/11/2024 04:29:21