Clean intermittent catheterization (CIC): barriers and patient reluctance

Bianchi D1, Rosato E1, Pletto S1, Terzoni S2, Abbate N1, Fanara F1, Finazzi Agrò E1

Research Type

Clinical

Abstract Category

Neurourology

Abstract 213
Urology 7 - Clinical Neurourology
Scientific Podium Short Oral Session 18
Friday 19th September 2025
17:00 - 17:07
Parallel Hall 2
Detrusor Hypocontractility Voiding Dysfunction Underactive Bladder Spinal Cord Injury Multiple Sclerosis
1. Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy, 2. Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Milan University, Milan, Italy
Presenter
Links

Abstract

Hypothesis / aims of study
Clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) is a validated and widely accepted tool in managing both neurogenic and non-neurogenic patients presenting with voiding dysfunction. Currently, very few concerns on this well known, established, and widely recognized procedure attract our attention. A critical aspect is still represented by patient reluctance and barriers in accepting CIC [1,2]. Aim of our scoping review was to identify the reasons affecting and limiting patient adherence to CIC.
Study design, materials and methods
We conducted a literature search on PubMed using the terms [clean intermittent catheterization] AND [learning OR teaching OR reluctance]. Papers reporting on chronic CIC for voiding dysfunction in adults were included. Studies simply reporting on CIC technique or author personal experiences were excluded. Also, articles on non-transurethral CIC and CIC in any kind of urinary diversion, surgical reconstruction or anatomical abnormalities were excluded.
Results
After removing duplicates, 504 articles were identified. After abstracts screening according to the inclusion criteria, a total of 45 articles were selected and considered for the review.
Interpretation of results
The included papers were classified into the following categories: education and nurses, general practitioner role, role of media, family role, and patients. An overlapping between the categories was observed and it did not represent a limitation, according to our idea of identifying multiple and diverse causes of obstacles to CIC [1-3]. Most of papers focused on patient education performed by nurses, including the question if starting it from a referral centre and then move to peripheral offices, or – on the contrary – schedule the teaching directly in smaller and dedicated centres. A fundamental aspect to be considered is patient ability in performing the manouvre and some papers aimed to define score criteria to screen and select neurologic patients in routine practice [3]. Also, the role of family has been investigated in providing the patient with both psycological and practical support. Recently, an increasing attention to the role of media has been reported in the literature. We identified articles describing the use of web tutorials and smartphone apps. Few papers focused on general practitioners education and involvement, and this may also play an important role. Results are summarised in Table 1.
Concluding message
In our opinion, despite the huge efforts already dedicated to CIC education in routine clinical practice, exploring the current limitations may be of help in taking further actions to discourage patients from dropping out. The present scoping review lays the foundations for our future project of a multicentre survey, followed by a Delphi consensus.
Figure 1 Table 1: Main key aspects to be considered in improving patient adherence to clean intermittent catheterization (CIC).
References
  1. Cobussen-Boekhorst H, Beekman J, van Wijlick E, Schaafstra J, van Kuppevelt D, Heesakkers J. Which factors make clean intermittent (self) catheterisation successful? J Clin Nurs. 2016 May;25(9-10):1308-18. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13187. Epub 2016 Mar 22. PMID: 27001288.
  2. Guinet-Lacoste A, Kerdraon J, Rousseau A, Gallien P, Previnaire JG, Perrouin-Verbe B, Amarenco G. Intermittent catheterization acceptance test (I-CAT): A tool to evaluate the global acceptance to practice clean intermittent self-catheterization. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Sep;36(7):1846-1854. doi: 10.1002/nau.23195. Epub 2017 Jan 16. PMID: 28090660.
  3. Haddad R, Lagnau P, Chesnel C, Miget G, Grasland M, Breton FL, Amarenco G, Hentzen C. In multiple sclerosis, a Functional Independence Measure = 107 is the best predictor of outcome after clean intermittent catheterization training. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Feb;66(1):101636. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2022.101636. Epub 2022 Nov 29. PMID: 35091114.
Disclosures
Funding None. Clinical Trial No Subjects None
09/07/2025 16:12:32