Abstracts submission will be open from 31 January until 3 April 2025 at 23:59:00 GMT
Each abstract will be limited to 500 words. The ICS and EUS have a joint scientific committee and we are grateful for both societies' abstract reviewers.
ABSTRACT CATEGORIES
ICS-EUS 2025 invites Clinical and Non-Clinical Abstracts in Urology, Urogynecology, Colorectal, Bowel Dysfunction, Nursing, Physiotherapy, Conservative Management and Pure and Applied Science.
Abstracts are accepted in the following categories:
| CATEGORIES |
|
| Anatomy / Biomechanics |
Overactive Bladder |
| Andrology NEW FOR 2025 |
Paediatrics |
| Anorectal / Bowel Dysfunction |
Pelvic Organ Prolapse |
| Conservative Management |
Pelvic Pain Syndromes |
| Continence Care Products / Devices / Technologies |
Pharmacology |
| E-Health |
Pregnancy and Pelvic Floor Disorders |
| Ethics |
Prevention and Public Health |
| Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) / Voiding Dysfunction |
Prostate Clinical / Surgical |
| Female Sexual Dysfunction |
Quality of Life / Patient and Caregiver Experiences |
| Female Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) |
Rehabilitation |
| Geriatrics / Gerontology |
Research Methods / Techniques |
| Health Services Delivery |
Transgender Health |
| Imaging |
Urethra Male / Female |
| Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) / Voiding Dysfunction |
Urodynamics |
| Male Sexual Dysfunction |
Urolithiasis NEW FOR 2025 |
| Male Stress Urinary Incontinence (Post Prostatectomy Incontinence) |
Uro-Oncology NEW FOR 2025 |
| Neurourology |
Urotechnology NEW FOR 2025 |
| Nocturia |
|
10 KEY POINTS TOWARDS A SUCCESSFUL ABSTRACT SUBMISSION!
Follow these steps to make the most of your submission!
- Read the submission rules! 5 min read containing key information!
- Lack of anonymity is automatic disqualification. Do not mention your name or the name of your clinic or university anywhere in your abstract text.
- The reviewers’ first score is for originality. If you’re presenting novel work, start the abstract with “this is the first….”or “this original…”.
- The next criterion is scientific merit. Your abstract must demonstrate your study to be scientifically sound.
- The methods of your abstract are scrupulously reviewed - make sure its a randomised trial or a well set up systematic review.
- Don’t split the results across several abstracts. Give absolute results and relative numbers.
- Ensure your conclusion responds to the question in your aims and is consistent with the results.
- Select the correct category and key words to ensure that your abstract is reviewed by someone in your discipline.
- For non-English speaking writers we recommend having your submission reviewed by someone who knows English well before submission.
- Make sure you use the correct and up to date ICS terminology. The use of obsolete terminology may cause rejection.